Gen Muhoozi Kainerugaba has taken another swipe at one of his brothers-in-law in a strongly worded social media statement, saying he has never insulted his brothers-in-law despite being married into a family where such relationships exist. Muhoozi made the remarks while reflecting on family relationships and the disagreements that have continued to attract public attention.
In his statement, the General said that he has always respected his brothers-in-law regardless of their circumstances or social position. He stressed that, in his view, being related through marriage should come with a certain level of respect and restraint, even when people have different opinions or engage in activities that others may consider less prestigious.
“I have never insulted my brothers-in-law. Even if they were sweeping the streets. I could never,” Muhoozi said. He then dramatically changed the tone of his message by referring to one of his brothers-in-law as a person who talks “endless bullshit,” making it clear that he was directing the criticism at a particular individual rather than speaking about all his brothers-in-law.
The General continued by saying that he had been married into a family and therefore understood the importance of respecting relatives acquired through marriage. His comments appeared to suggest that disagreements should not automatically lead to personal insults, although his own statement contained a sharp and highly personal criticism of the brother-in-law he was referring to.
Muhoozi’s remarks have attracted attention because of the identity of the family relationship involved. His brother-in-law Odrek Rwabwogo is a prominent Ugandan businessman and public figure, and the two have previously disagreed publicly on a number of issues. Their differences have at times become subjects of discussion in the Ugandan media and on social media platforms.
The latest comments come against the background of a relationship that has occasionally been marked by public disagreements. Muhoozi and Rwabwogo have expressed different positions on various matters, leading to exchanges that have attracted the attention of political observers, journalists and members of the public.
Although Muhoozi did not mention Rwabwogo by name in the quoted statement, his reference to a brother-in-law has been viewed in the context of the public disagreements involving the two. The wording of the message was particularly strong, showing that their differences remain a subject of open discussion.
Muhoozi’s statement also introduced a personal dimension into what has otherwise often been a public disagreement. Instead of focusing only on political or national issues, he referred directly to the family connection between himself and the person he was criticising.
The General appeared to draw a line between respect for family and disagreement with an individual’s public statements. He suggested that he would not insult his brothers-in-law simply because of their occupation or social standing, but he also made it clear that being family does not prevent him from strongly criticising what he considers unacceptable remarks.
His use of the word “Sitaani” added a dramatic and humorous element to the statement. Muhoozi appeared to use the term rhetorically while complaining about having a brother-in-law whom he believes speaks excessively or makes statements he strongly disagrees with.
The statement is likely to generate further discussion because both Muhoozi and Rwabwogo are well-known public figures. Their disagreements do not remain entirely private, as comments from either side can quickly attract reactions once they appear in the media or on social media.
Rwabwogo has previously been involved in public discussions over politics, business and national affairs, while Muhoozi has increasingly used social media to express his views on political and national issues. Their different public roles have occasionally brought them into the same conversations from opposing positions.
The family connection makes their disagreements particularly unusual in the eyes of the public. While political and public figures frequently disagree, disagreements between relatives can attract greater attention because the individuals involved have a personal relationship outside their public activities.
Muhoozi’s latest statement appears to show that he is not prepared to remain silent when he believes his brother-in-law has crossed a line. At the same time, he maintained that he has generally respected his brothers-in-law and would not insult them based on their occupation or circumstances.
The reference to someone “sweeping the streets” was used by Muhoozi to make a broader point about dignity and respect. He suggested that even if a brother-in-law were doing such work, he would still not insult him simply because of the nature of that job.
However, the General’s criticism indicates that his objection is not necessarily about a person’s position in society. Instead, his frustration appears to be connected to what the individual says publicly. By describing the brother-in-law’s comments as “endless bullshit,” Muhoozi made his disagreement unmistakably clear.
The latest exchange also demonstrates how family relationships can become complicated when relatives occupy prominent positions and have strong public opinions. In such circumstances, disagreements that might normally remain within a family can quickly become public controversies.
For members of the public following the dispute, Muhoozi’s statement adds another chapter to the continuing disagreements between him and Rwabwogo. Social media has increasingly provided a platform where public figures can address each other directly, sometimes without the traditional distance associated with political communication.
The remarks may also lead to renewed discussion about whether personal family relationships should influence public disagreements. Muhoozi’s statement suggests that, despite the family connection, he believes individuals can still be criticised when their public statements are considered unacceptable.
At the centre of the latest controversy is therefore a combination of family, public disagreements and strong language. Muhoozi says he has never insulted his brothers-in-law and insists that he respects them regardless of their circumstances, but he has openly expressed frustration with one particular brother-in-law whom he accuses of repeatedly making statements he strongly dislikes.
The latest remarks are expected to keep the public conversation around Muhoozi and Rwabwogo alive, particularly because their disagreements have previously attracted considerable media attention. For now, Muhoozi’s message makes his position clear: family ties may command his respect, but they have not stopped him from publicly expressing his anger toward a brother-in-law whose statements he believes have gone too far.
